From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. John J. Lease Realtors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2003
304 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05183

Argued March 28, 2003.

April 21, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants John J. Lease Realtors and John J. Lease III appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated May 15, 2002, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Drake, Sommers, Loeb, Tarshis Catania, PLLC, Newburgh, N.Y. (Stephen J. Gaba of counsel), for appellants.

Fellows, Hymowitz and Epstein, P.C., New City, N.Y. (Robert L. Fellows of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff Terry Santiago allegedly was injured when she tripped and fell on an exterior stair at her rented home in New Windsor. The defendants John J. Lease, Inc., John J. Lease Realtors, and John J. Lease III moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against John J. Lease, Inc., but found issues of fact as to whether the appellants were acting, inter alia, as managing agents responsible for the maintenance of the premises.

The appellants failed to sustain their burden in the first instance of eliminating all issues of fact entitling them prima facie to summary judgment (see Wingard v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr. 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853). They did not establish as a matter of law the capacity in which they were acting and the record remains unsettled as to whether they were merely employed by the corporate owner or were retained as independent managing agents in complete and exclusive control of the management and operation of the premises (see Guerrero v. Djuko Realty, 300 A.D.2d 542; Tucker v. Meola, 170 A.D.2d 667). Accordingly, the appellants were not entitled to summary judgment.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Santiago v. John J. Lease Realtors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2003
304 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Santiago v. John J. Lease Realtors

Case Details

Full title:TERRY SANTIAGO, ET AL., respondents, v. JOHN J. LEASE REALTORS, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 800

Citing Cases

Scott v. City of New York

In addition, the deposition testimony of Slattery and Philipoise also establishes that Merco routinely…

James v. Greenpoint Fin. Corp.

In support of its motion, Greenfield met its initial burden by demonstrating prima facie that it was not the…