Opinion
526047
07-11-2019
In the Matter of SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., Respondent, v. ALL COUNTY TOWING & RECOVERY, Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Peter B. O'Connell, Albany, for appellant. Law Offices of Rudolph J. Meola, Albany (Rudolph J. Meola of counsel), for Santander Consumer USA, Inc., respondent.
Peter B. O'Connell, Albany, for appellant.
Law Offices of Rudolph J. Meola, Albany (Rudolph J. Meola of counsel), for Santander Consumer USA, Inc., respondent.
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Devine and Rumsey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Mulvey, J. For the reasons stated in our recent decisions addressing the same issues (see Matter of Vaul Trust v. All County Towing & Recovery , 171 A.D.3d 1336, 1337, 97 N.Y.S.3d 359 [2019] ; Matter of Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. All County Towing , 171 A.D.3d 1258, 1259, 96 N.Y.S.3d 392 [2019] ; Matter of Ally Fin., Inc. v. All County Towing & Recovery , 166 A.D.3d 1442, 1444, 89 N.Y.S.3d 370 [2018], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 910, 103 N.Y.S.3d 362, 127 N.E.3d 320, 2019 WL 2622422 [June 27, 2019] ; Matter of HVT, Inc. v. All County Towing & Recovery , 166 A.D.3d 1441, 1442, 89 N.Y.S.3d 373 [2018], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 910, 103 N.Y.S.3d 362, 127 N.E.3d 320, 2019 WL 2622422 [June 27, 2019] ), we affirm, and find that Supreme Court did not err in reducing the amount of the daily storage fee charged by respondent All County Towing & Recovery (hereinafter respondent) and appropriately determined that respondent's asserted lien was valid only through September 19, 2016, the date of respondent's improper demand. Additionally, Supreme Court properly denied that part of respondent's motion seeking renewal (see Matter of HVT, Inc. v. All County Towing & Recovery , 166 A.D.3d at 1442, 89 N.Y.S.3d 373 ).
Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine and Rumsey, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the order and judgment and the order are affirmed, with costs.