From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sands v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 26, 1989
542 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-00168.

April 26, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Jerry Parker, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, Paul L. Sands, appeals from convictions for robbery with a weapon and assault, alleging that the dual convictions constitute a double jeopardy violation. He is correct.

In Richardson v. State, 523 So.2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), the fifth district was presented with an identical set of facts. The court ruled that the conviction for assault could not stand because it is a necessarily lesser included offense of robbery with a weapon. Id. at 747. We agree.

The appellant's conviction and sentence for assault are reversed. We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Sands v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 26, 1989
542 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Sands v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL L. SANDS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 26, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Standard Jury Instructions — Crim. Cases

See Higgins v. State, 565 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1990).But see Richardson v. State, 523 So.2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA…

Owens v. State

We address only his argument that he cannot be convicted of both armed robbery and aggravated assault. This…