From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SANDERS v. USDA RURAL HOUSING

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 28, 2007
NO. 3-06-0587 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

Summary

discussing ambiguity in case law

Summary of this case from Barrett v. H R Block, Inc.

Opinion

NO. 3-06-0587.

August 28, 2007


ORDER


Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 48) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 49).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 38) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Any claims of discrimination occurring prior to June 4, 2004, are DISMISSED as time-barred. 15 U.S.C. § 1691e(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

SANDERS v. USDA RURAL HOUSING

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 28, 2007
NO. 3-06-0587 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

discussing ambiguity in case law

Summary of this case from Barrett v. H R Block, Inc.
Case details for

SANDERS v. USDA RURAL HOUSING

Case Details

Full title:ALICE L. SANDERS v. USDA RURAL HOUSING, et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

NO. 3-06-0587 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

Citing Cases

Barrett v. H R Block, Inc.

The question of whether the continuing violations doctrine applies to ECOA claims is less settled. See…