From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 9, 2002
823 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D00-5125

Opinion filed August 9, 2002.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John A. Schaefer, Judge.


Rogelio Sanders appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to any right Sanders might have to file a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850 and Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla.2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Because the time for Sanders to seek such relief expired during the pendency of this appeal, any motion filed within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case shall be considered timely filed.See Finan v. State, 787 So.2d 64 (Fla.2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 9, 2002
823 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Sanders v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 9, 2002

Citations

823 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Balkcom v. State

See Romero v. State, 805 So.2d 92, 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Because the time for Balkcom to seek such relief…