From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 23, 1985
113 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

September 23, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent Jeanette Palmer.

Since plaintiffs never moved for a deficiency judgment within 90 days after delivery of the deed in the initial foreclosure action, the proceeds of this sale are deemed to be in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt and no right to recover any deficiency in any other action or proceeding exists (RPAPL 1371, [3]; see, Bedcro Realty Corp. v Title Guar. Trust Co., 290 N.Y. 520, 523; Statewide Sav. Loan Assn. v Canoe Hill, 54 A.D.2d 1018, affd 44 N.Y.2d 843; State Bank v Amak Enters., 77 Misc.2d 340). Hence, Trial Term correctly dismissed the complaint brought in this second foreclosure action. Bracken, J.P., O'Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanders v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 23, 1985
113 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Sanders v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:THELMA SANDERS et al., Appellants, v. JEANETTE PALMER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1985

Citations

113 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Marine Midland v. Landsdowne Mgmt. Assoc

The record establishes that Oliver Schools' attorney had notice of the January 17, 1992 sale, and plaintiff…

Crossland Savings, FSB v. Patton

These deeds, which were duly acknowledged, were accepted and retained without objection by counsel on said…