From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandefur v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 4, 1995
660 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-02750.

October 4, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Robert Bennett, Judge.

Ben Kay and Brett McIntosh of the Law Office of Ben Kay, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly D. Nolen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm appellant's judgments and sentences but reverse the imposition of attorney's fees because the fees were assessed without affording her the opportunity to object to the amount of the assessment. Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). On remand, appellant shall have thirty days from the date of our mandate within which to file a written objection to the amount of the fees. If an objection is filed with the trial court, the assessment shall be stricken and a new assessment shall not be imposed without notice and hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). Trice v. State, 655 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sandefur v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 4, 1995
660 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Sandefur v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOLLY SANDEFUR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 4, 1995

Citations

660 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

On remand, the appellant shall have thirty days from the date of the mandate within which to file a written…

S.D. v. State

On remand, appellant shall have thirty days from the date of this mandate within which to file a written…