From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. M H Enterprises

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 26, 2007
2:05-cv-0158-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2007)

Summary

rejecting plaintiffs’ contention that sanctions may be imposed under Rule 37(b) even when no court order has been violated

Summary of this case from Page v. Hertz Corp.

Opinion

2:05-cv-0158-RCJ-GWF.

March 26, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is the Order and Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr., entered July 19, 2006. No objections have been filed.

The Court has conducted a review of the record in this case and determines that the Order and Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered July 19, 2006, should be affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Order and Findings and Recommendation (#55) be affirmed and adopted.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. M H Enterprises

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 26, 2007
2:05-cv-0158-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2007)

rejecting plaintiffs’ contention that sanctions may be imposed under Rule 37(b) even when no court order has been violated

Summary of this case from Page v. Hertz Corp.
Case details for

Sanchez v. M H Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINA SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M H ENTERPRISES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 26, 2007

Citations

2:05-cv-0158-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

Page v. Hertz Corp.

Id. While this is certainly some support for the proposition that a court order is not necessary to impose…