From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8205 Index 303776/14

01-24-2019

Ariel SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Sim & Record, LLP, Bayside (Sang J. Sim, New York, of counsel), for appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Lorenzo Di Silvio of counsel), for respondents.


Sim & Record, LLP, Bayside (Sang J. Sim, New York, of counsel), for appellants.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Lorenzo Di Silvio of counsel), for respondents.

Sweeny, J.P., Tom, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

The court correctly dismissed plaintiffs' claims for false arrest and false imprisonment, given defendants' prima facie showing that the officers lawfully stopped the vehicle due to a problem with a taillight (see People v. Diaz, 232 A.D.2d 289, 289, 648 N.Y.S.2d 562 [1st Dept. 1996], lv denied sub nom. People v. Martinez, 89 N.Y.2d 944, 655 N.Y.S.2d 895, 678 N.E.2d 508 [1997] ), and that they obtained probable cause to search the car upon detection of a strong odor of pine or ammonia indicative of street level phencyclidine (PCP) (see People v. Darby, 263 A.D.2d 112, 113–114, 701 N.Y.S.2d 395 [1st Dept. 2000], lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 795, 711 N.Y.S.2d 163, 733 N.E.2d 235 [2000] ; People v. Smith, 66 A.D.3d 514, 887 N.Y.S.2d 562 [1st Dept. 2009], lv denied 13 N.Y.3d 942, 895 N.Y.S.2d 332, 922 N.E.2d 921 [2010] ). Plaintiffs' conclusory submissions in opposition to defendants' motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The existence of probable cause for the arrest also defeats plaintiffs' claim for malicious prosecution (see Broughton v. State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, 458, 373 N.Y.S.2d 87, 335 N.E.2d 310 [1975], cert denied sub nom. Schanbarger v. Kellogg, 423 U.S. 929, 96 S.Ct. 277, 46 L.Ed.2d 257 [1975] ), and the individual officers are also entitled to qualified immunity because the evidence supports the objective reasonableness of the instant stop, search, and arrest (see Delgado v. City of New York, 86 A.D.3d 502, 510, 928 N.Y.S.2d 487 [1st Dept. 2011] ).

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining claims and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Sanchez v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Ariel SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 24, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
90 N.Y.S.3d 529

Citing Cases

People v. Fudge

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession…

People v. Fudge

Supreme Court properly refused to suppress physical evidence discovered during a vehicle search. Contrary to…