From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Bonilla

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-19

In the Matter of Cecilia Maribel Pineda SANCHEZ, appellant, v. Jose Santos Hernandez BONILLA, respondent.


Bruno Joseph Bembi, Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Stack, J.H.O.), dated August 14, 2013, which, without a hearing, dismissed the custody petition.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the custody petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a hearing and new determination of the petition thereafter.

The Family Court erred in dismissing the petition in which the mother sought orders of custody for her two teenaged children. A natural parent has standing to seek legal custody of his or her child ( see Domestic Relations Law § 70 [a]; Family Ct. Act § 511; Debra H. v. Janice R., 14 N.Y.3d 576, 904 N.Y.S.2d 263, 930 N.E.2d 184,cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 908, 178 L.Ed.2d 749;Matter of Marcelina M.–G. v. Israel S., 112 A.D.3d 100, 973 N.Y.S.2d 714;T.V. v. New York State Dept. of Health, 88 A.D.3d 290, 301, 929 N.Y.S.2d 139). According to the petitioner, the children's father has abandoned the children and, due to their immigration status, they could be returned to El Salvador where they have been subjected to abuse by family members and threats by gang members. The petitioner has alleged that awarding her custody would be in the best interests of the children, since it would enable the children to apply for special immigrant juvenile status ( see Matter of Maria G.G.U. v. Pedro H.P., 114 A.D.3d 691, 979 N.Y.S.2d 843;Matter of Marisol N.H., ––– A.D.3d ––––, 979 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 00664 [2d Dept.2014];Matter of Maura A.R.–R. [Santos F.R.], 114 A.D.3d 687, 979 N.Y.S.2d 701).

Accordingly, since the Family Court dismissed the subject petition without conducting a hearing or considering the best interests of the children, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a hearing and a new determination of the custody petition thereafter ( see Matter of Maria E.S.G. v. Jose C.G.L., 114 A.D.3d 677, 979 N.Y.S.2d 841;Matter of Francisco M.–G. v. Marcelina M.–G., 100 A.D.3d 900, 955 N.Y.S.2d 350;Matter of Ashley W. [Verdele F.], 85 A.D.3d 807, 809, 925 N.Y.S.2d 551). MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LEVENTHAL and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Bonilla

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2014
115 A.D.3d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Bonilla

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cecilia Maribel Pineda SANCHEZ, appellant, v. Jose Santos…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 19, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 868
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1761

Citing Cases

Castellanos v. Recarte

This relief may be sought in the context of a Family Court Act article 6 custody proceeding (see e.g. Matter…

Linares-Mendez v. Cazanga-Payes

The Family Court should not have summarily dismissed the petition based on the mother's failure to establish…