From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuel v. Excelsior Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 20, 2014
No. 1:14-CV-456 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2014)

Summary

adopting magistrate judge's recommendation that the complaint be dismissed where the plaintiff "prematurely filed an amended complaint . . . prior to the deadline for objections and prior to any ruling" on the report-recommendation, and dismissing amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim

Summary of this case from Ivey v. New York

Opinion

No. 1:14-CV-456 (DNH/RFT)

05-20-2014

WAYNE SAMUEL, Plaintiff, v. EXCELSIOR COLLEGE, KYLENE ABRAHAM, and PEGGY GOLDEN, Defendants.

WAYNE SAMUEL Plaintiff, Pro Se OF COUNSEL:


APPEARANCES: WAYNE SAMUEL
Plaintiff, Pro Se
OF COUNSEL: DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Wayne Samuel brought this action alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 30, 2014, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted but recommended that plaintiff be given an opportunity to file an amended complaint prior to dismissal. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. However, plaintiff prematurely filed an amended complaint dated May 12 and received on May 14, 2014, prior to the deadline for objections and prior to any ruling by the undersigned on Magistrate Judge Treece's Report- Recommendation.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Having reviewed plaintiff's amended complaint, it is found that the amended complaint does not cure the deficiencies addressed in Magistrate Judge Treece's Report-Recommendation. In the Report-Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Treece advised plaintiff that he must allege claims of misconduct or wrongdoing against defendants that he has a legal right to pursue and over which this court has jurisdiction. Plaintiff has failed to do so in his amended complaint. The amended complaint indicates that plaintiff's race is African American, a newly included fact, and also attaches numerous exhibits. However, plaintiff has added nothing to address the problems identified in the Report-Recommendation. Accordingly, plaintiff's entire complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted for the same reasons stated in the Report-Recommendation.

As plaintiff has already had an opportunity to amend, no further amendments will be permitted.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED; and

2. The Clerk is directed to file a Judgment accordingly, serve a copy of this Decision and Order and the Judgment on plaintiff, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Senior United States District Judge
Dated: May 20, 2014

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Samuel v. Excelsior Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 20, 2014
No. 1:14-CV-456 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2014)

adopting magistrate judge's recommendation that the complaint be dismissed where the plaintiff "prematurely filed an amended complaint . . . prior to the deadline for objections and prior to any ruling" on the report-recommendation, and dismissing amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim

Summary of this case from Ivey v. New York

dismissing Title IV claim brought by student with regard to a failing grade where there was no indication the case concerned a failure to desegregate

Summary of this case from Weiss v. City Univ. of N.Y.
Case details for

Samuel v. Excelsior Coll.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE SAMUEL, Plaintiff, v. EXCELSIOR COLLEGE, KYLENE ABRAHAM, and PEGGY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 20, 2014

Citations

No. 1:14-CV-456 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Weiss v. City Univ. of N.Y.

Even assuming that a private cause of action exists under Title IV, the Amended Complaint does not concern a…

McDaniels v. Mertens

"[I]n stating a claim for a violation of equal protection rights, 'it is axiomatic that a plaintiff must…