From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salt Lake City v. Revene

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 1, 1942
127 P.2d 254 (Utah 1942)

Opinion

No. 6330.

Decided July 1, 1942.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. On affirmance of judgment sustaining defendant's demurrer to complaint in prosecution for violation of city ordinance relating to closing of barber shops, on ground that ordinance was invalid, costs should not have been allowed against city.

Nephi City v. Forest, 41 Utah 433, 126 P. 332.

See 43 C.J., Municipal Corporations, sec. 735; 14 Am. Jur. 59.

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; M.J. Bronson, Judge.

On petition for rehearing.

Part of prior opinion stricken, and, with that change, prior opinion and decision confirmed.

E.R. Christensen, A. Pratt Kesler, Gerald Irvine, and Clarence M. Beck, all of Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Clifford L. Ashton, of Salt Lake City, for respondent.


For former opinion, see 101 Utah ___., 124 P.2d 537.


By inadvertence costs in this case were allowed against the city. This was error. See Nephi City v. Forrest, 41 Utah 433, 126 P. 332. That part of the decision which reads "costs to respondent" [ 124 P.2d 537, 540] is hereby stricken and with that change the opinion and decision is confirmed.


Summaries of

Salt Lake City v. Revene

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 1, 1942
127 P.2d 254 (Utah 1942)
Case details for

Salt Lake City v. Revene

Case Details

Full title:SALT LAKE CITY v. REVENE

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jul 1, 1942

Citations

127 P.2d 254 (Utah 1942)
127 P.2d 254

Citing Cases

Salt Lake City v. Revene

Clifford L. Ashton, of Salt Lake City, for respondent. For opinion on rehearing, see 101 Utah 512, 127 P.2d…