From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salgado v. United States

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 22, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-322 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 2:24-cv-322 (WJM)

01-22-2024

NOEL SALGADO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM J. MARTINI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pro se Petitioner, Noel Salgado, a prisoner confined at F.C.I. Hazelton in Bruceton Mills, West Virginia, seeks to file a motion to vacate pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Local Civil Rule 81.2 provides:

Unless prepared by counsel, . . . motions under 28 U.S.C. §2255 shall be in writing (legibly handwritten in ink or typewritten), signed by the petitioner or movant, on forms supplied by the Clerk.
L. Civ. R. 81.2(a). Petitioner did not use the updated habeas form supplied by the Clerk for section 2255 motions, i.e., AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014).

Therefore, IT IS this 22nd day of January, 2024, ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case; Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a “dismissal” for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (3d Cir. 2013) (distinguishing administrative terminations from dismissals); Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir. 2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff's Dep't., 413 Fed.Appx. 498, 502 (3rd Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (“[The] statute of limitations is met when a [motion] is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs ....”); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk's service of the blank section 2255 form shall not be construed as this Court's finding that the motion is or is not timely, or that Petitioner's claims are or are not procedurally defaulted; and it is further

ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in a writing addressed to the Clerk within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order; Petitioner's writing shall include a complete, signed habeas petition on the appropriate updated form supplied by the Clerk; and it is further

ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and a complete, signed petition, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a blank section 2255 form- AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014) upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.


Summaries of

Salgado v. United States

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 22, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-322 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Salgado v. United States

Case Details

Full title:NOEL SALGADO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

Civ. 2:24-cv-322 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 22, 2024)