From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 25, 1972
486 S.W.2d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Opinion

Nos. 45724, 45725.

October 25, 1972.

Appeal from the 167th District Court of Travis County, Tom Blackwell, J.

Edith P. Roberts, Austin, for appellants.

Robert O. Smith, Dist. Atty., and Michael J. McCormick, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


These are appeals from judgments forfeiting bail bonds.

The parties to these causes through a joint motion, pray that they be reversed and remanded for the purpose of entering a compromise settlement.

Bond forfeiture appeals are governed by 'the same rules that govern civil actions where an appeal is taken or a writ of error sued out'. Article 44.44, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Reeves v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 757.

A judgment of reversal will be entered when parties to a civil cause on appeal, through a joint motion, request that the cause be reversed for the purpose of entering an agreed judgment. Butler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 907, and the cases cited therein.

The judgments are reversed and the causes remanded to the 167th District Court of Travis County, and the clerk is directed to issue mandates immediately upon the announcement of this decision.


Summaries of

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 25, 1972
486 S.W.2d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
Case details for

Salazar v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gilbert Olgen SALAZAR et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 25, 1972

Citations

486 S.W.2d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Surety Ins. Co. of California v. State

       The proceedings for the review of bond forfeiture cases are controlled by the law and the rules…

Scott v. State

Bond forfeiture appeals are governed by the same rules governing civil actions where an appeal is taken. Tex…