From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salander v. Gratiot Cnty. Circuit Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 4, 2012
Case No. 12-11378 (E.D. Mich. May. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11378

05-04-2012

WILLIAM JOE SALANDER, Plaintiff, v. GRATIOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant.


Hon. John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed his complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis on March 27, 2012. The court finds Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis to be facially sufficient and, therefore, grants Plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Gibson v. R.G. Smith Co., 915 F.2d 260, 262 (6th Cir. 1990).

Once a court grants a plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis, it must review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court "shall dismiss" the case if the court finds that it is "(i) frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

In order to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, "a complaint must contain either direct or inferential allegations respecting all the material elements to sustain a recovery under some viable legal theory." Advocacy Org. for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 176 F.3d 315, 319 (6th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). "[E]ven though a complaint need not contain 'detailed' factual allegations, its 'factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true.'" Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, 502 F.3d 545, 548 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)).

Plaintiff's complaint is conclusory and devoid of factual allegations sufficient to support a claim for relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and the court must dismiss Plaintiff's complaint.

SO ORDERED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, May 4, 2012, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Salander v. Gratiot Cnty. Circuit Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 4, 2012
Case No. 12-11378 (E.D. Mich. May. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Salander v. Gratiot Cnty. Circuit Court

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JOE SALANDER, Plaintiff, v. GRATIOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11378 (E.D. Mich. May. 4, 2012)