From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salaam v. Adams

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2006
9:03-CV-0517 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)

Summary

finding no serious medical need where the medical records indicated that the plaintiff exhibited no signs of injury "during the days and weeks following the alleged assault," and where the records indicated that the complaints were "sporadic in nature and not of such severity as to be 'urgent'"

Summary of this case from Benitez v. Salotti

Opinion

9:03-CV-0517 (LEK/GHL).

September 29, 2006


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 18, 2006, by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 44). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Rasool Salaam, which were filed on September 11, 2006. Objections (Dkt. No. 45).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Salaam v. Adams

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2006
9:03-CV-0517 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)

finding no serious medical need where the medical records indicated that the plaintiff exhibited no signs of injury "during the days and weeks following the alleged assault," and where the records indicated that the complaints were "sporadic in nature and not of such severity as to be 'urgent'"

Summary of this case from Benitez v. Salotti

adopting R&R

Summary of this case from Adamson v. Miller

approving and adopting Report-Recommendation of Lowe, M.J.

Summary of this case from Steele v. Ayotte
Case details for

Salaam v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:RASOOL SALAAM, Plaintiff, v. D. ADAMS, Facility Nurse; SUSAN A. WALSH…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2006

Citations

9:03-CV-0517 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wortham v. Plourde

Another court within this circuit has held that a need for physical therapy does not constitute a serious…

Steele v. Ayotte

Complaints of discomfort do not rise to the level of a serious medical need. See Alston v. Delpeschio,…