From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sainpaulin v. Comm'r of Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 24, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

529924

09-24-2020

In the Matter of the Claim of Shahadah SAINPAULIN, Appellant. v. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Shahadah Sainpaulin, Scottsville, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.


Shahadah Sainpaulin, Scottsville, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 8, 2019, which, among other things, dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) issued a decision on November 15, 2018 which, among other things, sustained an initial determination finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits during a specified period and that she made a willful false statement to obtain benefits. On December 14, 2018, claimant appealed the ALJ's decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which, as pertinent here, dismissed claimant's appeal as untimely. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. " Labor Law § 621(1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20 days of the mailing or personal delivery of the decision, and this time requirement is strictly construed" ( Matter of Watts [Commissioner of Labor], 179 A.D.3d 1379, 1379, 114 N.Y.S.3d 728 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Alford [Commissioner of Labor], 153 A.D.3d 1479, 1479, 59 N.Y.S.3d 727 [2017] ). The record reflects that claimant did not appeal the ALJ's decision to the Board within the statutory time period and did not offer any explanation for the delay. As such, the merits of the ALJ's decision are not properly before this Court, and the Board's decision to dismiss claimant's appeal as untimely will not be disturbed (see Matter of Watts [Commissioner of Labor], 179 A.D.3d at 1379, 114 N.Y.S.3d 728 ; Matter of Williams [Commissioner of Labor], 163 A.D.3d 1389, 1390, 77 N.Y.S.3d 903 [2018] ; Matter of Page [Commissioner of Labor], 152 A.D.3d 857, 858, 57 N.Y.S.3d 774 [2017] ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Sainpaulin v. Comm'r of Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 24, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Sainpaulin v. Comm'r of Labor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Shahadah SAINPAULIN, Appellant. v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 24, 2020

Citations

186 A.D.3d 1853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
186 A.D.3d 1853

Citing Cases

Cromwell v. Comm'r of Labor

The record reflects that claimant neither appealed the ALJ's decision within the statutory time period nor…

Chin v. Comm'r of Labor

" Labor Law § 621(1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20…