From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saif Corporation v. Williams

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 13, 1995
906 P.2d 868 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

91-10443; CA A76540

Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court October 24, 1995.

Remanded for reconsideration December 13, 1995.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

James L. Edmunson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Malagon, Moore, Johnson Jensen.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Richardson, Chief Judge, and Leeson, Judge.


On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, SAIF v. Williams, 321 Or. 559, 901 P.2d 246 (1995).


PER CURIAM

Remanded for reconsideration.


In SAIF v. Williams, 133 Or. App. 766, 893 P.2d 577 (1995), on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in the light of SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or. 192, 881 P.2d 773 (1994), we held that claimant was entitled to an attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1). SAIF sought review and the Supreme Court has again remanded, 321 Or. 559, 901 P.2d 246 (1995), this time for reconsideration in the light of ORS 656.368(1), as amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332, section 43.

Because the 1995 amendments may affect the outcome of this case, we remand to the Workers' Compensation Board for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Santos v. Caryall Transport, 137 Or. App. 527, 905 P.2d 865 (1995).

Remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Saif Corporation v. Williams

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 13, 1995
906 P.2d 868 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Saif Corporation v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Gayle J. Williams, Claimant. SAIF…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 13, 1995

Citations

906 P.2d 868 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
906 P.2d 868