From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sager v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2014
Case No. SA CV 12-1015 FMO (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)

Summary

granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company on plaintiff's breach of insurance contract claim which was premised on the allegation that his former girlfriend had refused to return his property he had left at the condominium they had shared and that a theft had therefore occurred which was covered by his insurance policy

Summary of this case from Pac. Marine Ctr., Inc. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

Opinion

Case No. SA CV 12-1015 FMO (MLGx)

03-31-2014

DANIEL SAGER, Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Minute Order Re: Pending Motion, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice.

_______________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sager v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2014
Case No. SA CV 12-1015 FMO (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)

granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company on plaintiff's breach of insurance contract claim which was premised on the allegation that his former girlfriend had refused to return his property he had left at the condominium they had shared and that a theft had therefore occurred which was covered by his insurance policy

Summary of this case from Pac. Marine Ctr., Inc. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Sager v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL SAGER, Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. SA CV 12-1015 FMO (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Pac. Marine Ctr., Inc. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

" Id. at 546, 132 Cal.Rptr.3d 742 ; see alsoStevens v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. , Case No. 3:14-cv-02043 SC, 2015…

Ariz. Bd. of Regents v. Doe

It should go without saying that no participant in a judicial proceeding may address another participant with…