Opinion
2013-11-27
In the Matter of Francisco SAGARDIA, Petitioner, v. P. CHAPPIUS Jr., as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Francisco Sagardia, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Francisco Sagardia, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling after a nurse observed him pretend to swallow his medication and begin to walk away with the medication in the bottom of his juice cup. When the nurse questioned petitioner as to what was in his cup, petitioner quickly brought the cup back up to his mouth and swallowed the medication. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged, and this determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Initially, inasmuch as a substantial evidence question was raised in the petition and there were no “other objections as could terminate the proceeding ... without reaching the substantial evidence issue” (CPLR 7804 [g] ), this proceeding was properly transferred to this Court ( see Matter of Abreu v. Bezio, 78 A.D.3d 1341, 1341, 911 N.Y.S.2d 240 [2010] ). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Cruz v. Walsh, 87 A.D.3d 1234, 1234–1235, 930 N.Y.S.2d 298 [2011]; Matter of English v. Fischer, 55 A.D.3d 1206, 1206, 865 N.Y.S.2d 585 [2008] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Hearing Officer could reasonably infer from the evidence that petitioner intended to take the medication out of the area. Moreover, petitioner's denial of the charge and identification of alleged inconsistencies in witness testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Bethune v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 966, 967, 968 N.Y.S.2d 813 [2013], lv. denied22 N.Y.3d 855, 2013 WL 6065934 [Nov. 19, 2013] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.