From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safeguard Security, Incorporated v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1996
225 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 12, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


Summary judgment was properly granted since plaintiff failed to come forward with any admissible proof of compensable damages ( see, Brauner v Columbia Broadcasting Sys., 221 A.D.2d 306). Plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Safeguard Security, Incorporated v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1996
225 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Safeguard Security, Incorporated v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:SAFEGUARD SECURITY, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. JOSEPH RYAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 689

Citing Cases

TC Tradeco, LLC v. Karmaloop Europe, AG

Plaintiff's generalities that it sustained damages and the discovery responses and spreadsheets prepared for…

Modern Art Services, Ltd. v. OCA Long Island City

As the Supreme Court properly found, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a…