From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sadowsky v. Ingersoll-Rand Company

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 03-0059 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-0059.

June 1, 2007


MEMORANDUM and ORDER


This is an age discrimination case. A jury returned a verdict on February 23, 2005, awarding plaintiff $50,000 in compensatory damages. Before the court is plaintiff's third petition for attorneys' fees [doc. no. 91]. We have previously awarded plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs in the total amount of $257,279.96.

In his petition for attorneys' fees and costs, plaintiff asks that this court award him $11,594.15 for work performed by his attorneys between January and December of 2006. This work relates exclusively to plaintiff's second and third fee petitions. For the following reasons, we will award plaintiff a portion of the fees and costs requested.

Plaintiff is entitled to a "reasonable attorney's fee," which may include compensation for time spent litigating the issue of a reasonable fee. 29 U.S.C. § 216; Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 53 (3d Cir. 1978). This policy encourages attorneys to represent indigent clients and act as private attorneys general, but should not result in a windfall to counsel. Planned Parenthood of Cent. New Jersey v. Attorney General of State of New Jersey, 297 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 2002) (ruling made in the context of a section 1988 action); City of Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561, 575 (1986). With respect to hours spent, a court is directed to deduct hours from the calculation if they are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary. Maldonado v. Houstoun, 256 F.3d 181, 184 (3d Cir. 2001); Rode v. Dellarciprete, 892 F.2d 1177, 1183 (3d Cir. 1990).

Plaintiff's attorneys charged more than 60 hours to issues related to the second and third fee petitions. Defendant contends that plaintiff's petition is patently unreasonable, given the large amount of attorneys' fees already awarded in this case, this court's admonition that future fee petitions would not be expected, and this court's prior determination that plaintiff had been adequately compensated for his work in connection with this case.

We find that the hours expended on fee issues are unreasonable and excessive. The issues are not complex, and do not warrant such an extensive amount of time. They certainly do not require the attention of two attorneys. As such we will reduce the fees by 75 percent. Therefore, we make an award of $2,898.54 ($11,594.15 × .25).

An appropriate order follows.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's petition for attorneys fees [doc. no. 91] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $2,898.54.


Summaries of

Sadowsky v. Ingersoll-Rand Company

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 03-0059 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Sadowsky v. Ingersoll-Rand Company

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. SADOWSKY Plaintiff, v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 1, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-0059 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2007)