From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacco v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 25, 2008
9:07-CV-0078 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2008)

Opinion

9:07-CV-0078.

September 25, 2008

FRANK SACCO, Petitioner, pro se, 03-A-5346.

CHARLES E. ROBERTS, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, ANDREW T. BAXTER, Acting United States Attorney, Syracuse, New York, Attorney for Respondent.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini, duly filed on the 18th day of August 2008. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot on the basis that petitioner is deceased.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sacco v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 25, 2008
9:07-CV-0078 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Sacco v. U.S. Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SACCO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 25, 2008

Citations

9:07-CV-0078 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Griffin

On his call home from God in 2017, Tucker was released from state custody by an infinitely higher authority.…

Taylor v. Capra

See, e.g., Hailey v. Russell, 394 U.S. 915, 915 (1969) (“Upon the suggestion of mootness by reason of the…