From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2000
270 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 17, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 19, 1999, which granted the defendants' respective motions to impose a sanction upon them and upon their attorneys pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1(c) for engaging in frivolous conduct.

Dollinger, Gonski Grossman, Carle Place, N.Y. (Matthew Dollinger of counsel), for appellants.

Rivkin, Radler Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Stephen J. Smirti, James F. Stewart, and Michael P. Versichelli of counsel), for respondent Symbol Technologies, Inc.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the appellants engaged in frivolous conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c).

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2000
270 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. Sacca, d/b/a Sacca Associates International Real Estate, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

Katz v. Katz

In any event, it appears that the dates set by the Supreme Court for completion of discovery were not…