Opinion
1:22-cv-01927 (SDA)
2022-11-02
Adrienne Marie Ward, Sahand Farahati, Thomas James Fleming, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. Andrew David Gladstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York, NY, Adrienne Marie Ward, Sahand Farahati, Thomas James Fleming, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs Empery Asset Master, Ltd., Empery Tax Efficient, LP, Empery Tax Efficient III, LP. Jay Kevin Musoff, Loeb & Loeb LLP, New York, NY, William Michael Regan, Allison Michele Wuertz, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Kiromic Biopharma, Inc. Marc Peter Berger, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, NY, Anthony C. Piccirillo, George S. Wang, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Maurizio Chiriva-Internati. William Michael Regan, Allison Michele Wuertz, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants Gianluca Rotino, Pietro Bersani. Alex Jason Kaplan, Ariel Atlas, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, Yolanda Garcia, Yvette Ostolaza, Sidley Austin LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendants Americo Cicchetti, Michael Nagel, Jerry Schneider. David Alan Schrader, Paykin Krieg & Adams PC, Purchase, NY, for Defendant ThinkEquity LLC.
Adrienne Marie Ward, Sahand Farahati, Thomas James Fleming, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. Andrew David Gladstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York, NY, Adrienne Marie Ward, Sahand Farahati, Thomas James Fleming, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs Empery Asset Master, Ltd., Empery Tax Efficient, LP, Empery Tax Efficient III, LP. Jay Kevin Musoff, Loeb & Loeb LLP, New York, NY, William Michael Regan, Allison Michele Wuertz, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Kiromic Biopharma, Inc. Marc Peter Berger, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, NY, Anthony C. Piccirillo, George S. Wang, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Maurizio Chiriva-Internati. William Michael Regan, Allison Michele Wuertz, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants Gianluca Rotino, Pietro Bersani. Alex Jason Kaplan, Ariel Atlas, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, Yolanda Garcia, Yvette Ostolaza, Sidley Austin LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendants Americo Cicchetti, Michael Nagel, Jerry Schneider. David Alan Schrader, Paykin Krieg & Adams PC, Purchase, NY, for Defendant ThinkEquity LLC. OPINION AND ORDER STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge:
Pending before the Court is a Consent Motion by Plaintiffs Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. ("Sabby") and Empery Asset Master, Ltd., Empery Tax Efficient, LP and Empery Tax Efficient III, LP (collectively, "Empery", and with Sabby, "Plaintiffs"), for an Order pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(10), approving the issuance of subordinated convertible promissory notes (the "Convertible Notes") of Kiromic Biopharma, Inc. ("Kiromic"), as well as the shares of common stock of Kiromic issuable upon conversion of such Convertible Notes, as exempt from registration under the 1933 Act and without restrictive legends. (Consent Motion, ECF No. 117.) For the reasons set forth below, the Consent Motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Kiromic is a Delaware corporation whose common stock is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and publicly traded on NASDAQ. (See First Am. Compl. ("FAC"), ECF No. 76, ¶¶ 1, 17.) On March 7, 2022, Plaintiffs commenced this action against Kiromic and certain current and former directors (collectively, the "Kiromic Defendants"), seeking damages under Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") for false and misleading statements in offering documents. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 62-86.) Plaintiffs had invested a total of $7,500,000 in the offering. (Id. ¶ 2.)
On May 22, 2022, Plaintiffs filed the FAC, which named an additional defendant, ThinkEquity LLC ("ThinkEquity"), which was Kiromic's investment bank in the offering. (FAC ¶ 18.) On September 12, 2022, all Kiromic Defendants (with the exception of Mr. Tontat, who resides in France and has not been served), moved to dismiss the FAC. (See Mots. To Dismiss, ECF Nos. 86, 89 & 93.)
On September 17, 2022, ThinkEquity filed its answer and crossclaim against the Kiromic Defendants. (ThinkEquity Answer, ECF No. 98.) On October 13, 2022, ThinkEquity dismissed its crossclaim without prejudice, and on October 14, 2022, Plaintiffs dismissed ThinkEquity from this action without prejudice. (See 10/13/22 Order, ECF No. 114; 10/14/22 Order, ECF No. 115.)
On October 9, 2022, Sabby and Defendants entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and Mutual Release, which was amended on October 25, 2022 (the "Sabby Settlement Agreement"), and Empery and Defendants entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and Mutual Release which was amended on October 26, 2022 (the "Empery Settlement Agreement" and collectively with the Sabby Settlement Agreement, the "Settlement Agreements"). (Ward Decl., Ex. 1 (Sabby Settl. Agmt., ECF No. 119-1) & Ex. 2 (Empery Settl. Agmt., ECF No. 119-2).) The Settlement Agreements resolve all claims in this action, subject to this Court's approval of the requested Section 3(a)(10) issuance addressed below. (See id.)
The versions of the Settlement agreements annexed to the Ward Declaration are not executed. However, counsel for the parties represented to the Court during the telephonic hearing on November 2, 2022 that the Agreements have been fully executed.
Pursuant to the Sabby Settlement Agreement, Kiromic agreed to issue to Sabby or its designees (the "Sabby Recipients"), a Convertible Note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,656,720 (the "Sabby Note"), and pursuant to the Empery Settlement Agreement to issue to Empery or its designees (the "Empery Recipients"), a Convertible Note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,656,720 (the "Empery Note" and collectively with the Sabby Note, the "Notes"), each convertible into shares of Kiromic common stock (the "Shares"). (Sabby Settl. Agmt. ¶ 1; Empery Settl. Agmt. ¶ 1.) Each of the Settlement Agreements provides that the Notes will not be registered and may not be sold unless subject to a registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration, but that the Sabby Recipients and Empery Recipients may seek an Order pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act for an exemption from registration. (Sabby Settl. Agmt. ¶ 3; Empery Settl. Agmt. ¶ 3.) The pending Consent Motion expressly is contemplated by the terms of the Settlement Agreements. (See id.)
Each of the Sabby Recipients and the Empery Recipients are receiving Notes that may be converted to into shares of Kiromic common stock, subject to customary beneficial ownership blockers at 9.99% so that there is no prospect of a change in control (the "Beneficial Ownership Limitation"). (See Sabby Settl. Agmt. ¶ 1; Empery Settl. Agmt. ¶ 1; see also Consent Mem., ECF No. 118, at 7.)
LEGAL STANDARDS
Generally, under the 1933 Act, public companies are not permitted to issue their stock — and shareholders receiving those shares are not permitted to immediately resell them into public markets — without first filing a registration statement. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(c), 77d(a)(1). However, Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act provides an exemption from such general rule:
Exempted Securities. Except as hereinafter expressly provided, the provisions of this subchapter shall not apply to any of the following classes of securities: . . . (10) . . . [A]ny security which is issued in exchange for one or more bona fide outstanding securities, claims or property interests, or partly in such exchange and partly for cash, where the terms and conditions of such issuance and exchange are approved, after a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions at which all persons to whom it is proposed to issue securities in such exchange shall have the right to appear, by any court . . . .15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(10). Thus, the statutory prerequisites for an issuer claiming a Section 3(a)(10) exemption are: (1) an exchange for outstanding securities, claims or property interests; (2) a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions at which all persons to whom it is proposed to issue securities shall have the right to appear; and (3) a finding of fairness and approval by a court. See YA II PN, Ltd. v. Taronis Techs., Inc., 435 F. Supp. 3d 622, 625 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (holding that proposed settlement of action satisfied requirements of Section 3(a)(10)); see also U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Legal Bulletin No. 3A.
A copy of SEC Staff Legal Bulletin 3A is annexed as Exhibit C to the Ward Declaration (ECF No. 119-3).
DISCUSSION
The Court finds that all the requirements of Section 3(a)(10) identified above have been met. First, the Settlement Agreements provide for the requisite exchange. Second, a telephonic hearing was held on November 2, 2022, during which counsel for the parties participated. Third, the Court finds that "the terms and conditions of the exchange [are] 'fair' to those to whom securities will be issued." In re Bd. of Directors of Multicanal S.A., 340 B.R. 154, 169 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006). Indeed, both Sabby and Empery filed sworn declarations regarding the fairness of the transaction. (See Grundstein Decl., ECF No. 119-4, ¶ 6; Lane Decl., ECF No. 119-5, ¶ 6.)
CONCLUSION
By reason of the foregoing, the Court finds that the statutory prerequisites for a Section 3(a)(10) exemption are satisfied and hereby GRANTS the Consent Motion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, as follows:
1. The issuance and/or transfer of Convertible Notes to Empery and/or their designees in the aggregate principal amount of $1,656,720 (the "Empery Notes"), pursuant to the Empery Settlement Agreement, is hereby approved as fair within the meaning of Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act, and (i) such Empery Notes are therefore unrestricted and exempt from registration with the SEC, and (ii) the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Kiromic issuable upon conversion of the Empery Notes in accordance with their terms (including the Beneficial
Ownership Limitation) will be unrestricted, exempt from registration with the SEC and may be issued without any restrictive legends.
2. The issuance and/or transfer of Convertible Notes to Sabby and/or their designees in the aggregate principal amount of $1,656,720 (the "Sabby Notes"), pursuant to the Sabby Settlement Agreement, is hereby approved as fair within the meaning of Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act, and (i) such Sabby Notes are therefore unrestricted and exempt from registration with the SEC, and (ii) the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Kiromic issuable upon conversion of the Sabby Notes in accordance with their terms (including the Beneficial Ownership Limitation) will be unrestricted, exempt from registration with the SEC and may be issued without any restrictive legends.
3. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter final judgment dismissing the First Amended Complaint and closing the case. This Court shall retain jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to resolve any issues relating to this Order.