From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S. v. Pilkerton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1902
41 S.E. 1037 (N.C. 1902)

Opinion

(February Term, 1902.)

Attorney-General for the State. (741)

Glenn, Manly Hendren for defendant.


For the reasons set out in S. v. Briggs, ante, 693, there was error in the judgment of the court below, and there must be a new trial.

Reversed.

DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

S. v. Pilkerton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1902
41 S.E. 1037 (N.C. 1902)
Case details for

S. v. Pilkerton

Case Details

Full title:STATE, APPELLANT, v. J. M. PILKERTON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1902

Citations

41 S.E. 1037 (N.C. 1902)
130 N.C. 740

Citing Cases

State v. Wilson

No error. Cited: S. v. Brown, 109 N.C. 806; Staton v. R. R., 111 N.C. 282; S. v. New, 130 N.C. 740.…

Brodnax v. Groom

Per curiam. Judgment affirmed. Cited: Patterson v. Hubbs, 65 N.C. 122; Wilson v. Charlotte, 74 N.C. 759;…