December 23, 1938.
In an action to obtain specific performance of a contract, the defendant moved for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The motion was denied. Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Full title:S. B. RUBBER CHEMICAL CORP. and HAROLD BECHER, Respondents, v. JACOB…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 23, 1938
See Barnum v. Frickey 115 A.D.2d 977, 977 (4th Dep't. 1985). Ratification need not be explicit; rather, it…
Dyer v. Great Eastern Ins. Co."It is arguable by analogy that the plaintiff is in fact a direct third party beneficiary; between the…