From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 29, 2022
3:21-cv-01883 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-01883

09-29-2022

KYLE RUTTER, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


DARRELL CLAY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge

This is an appeal from the denial of Social Security benefits. I referred the petition to the Magistrate Judge for filing of a Report and Recommendation, which the Magistrate Judge has filed (Doc. 13). In the Report and Recommendation Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay recommended that I find the Commissioner's decision denying disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income not supported by substantial evidence and recommend the decision be reversed. The Commissioner indicates (Doc. 14) it will not be filing an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

On de novo review, I find the Report and Recommendation well-taken in all respects. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of this court, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed .

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rutter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 29, 2022
3:21-cv-01883 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Rutter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:KYLE RUTTER, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-01883 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2022)

Citing Cases

Neifert v. Kijakazi

When confronted with such material inconsistencies in an ALJ's RFC evaluation it has been held that…