From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russo v. Paladino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

November 17, 1952.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See 281 App. Div. 753.]


In this action against a surviving partner and others for an accounting of partnership assets brought by the administratrix of the deceased partner and by his wife and son, individually, the complaint has been dismissed on the ground that the only person entitled to seek an accounting is the administratrix of the deceased partner and, as to the administratrix, the action is barred by the ten-year Statute of Limitations. On this appeal by the plaintiffs from the order and judgment dismissing their complaint, the only argument made is that the term "legal representative" used in sections 73 Partnership and 74 Partnership of the Partnership Law includes the infant son of the deceased partner and, therefore, the Statute of Limitations is not a bar. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. ( Griswold v. Sawyer, 125 N.Y. 411; Losch v. Marcin, 251 N.Y. 402, 410; McQuaide v. Perot, 223 N.Y. 75, 79.)


Summaries of

Russo v. Paladino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Russo v. Paladino

Case Details

Full title:MARIE LA RUSSO, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
116 N.Y.S.2d 617

Citing Cases

Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.

For example, if a partner expropriates essential pieces of partnership property before the partnership fully…

Ewing v. Caldwell

This is in accord with G.S. 28-172, which provides: "Upon the death of any person, all demands whatsoever,…