From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 7, 1963
108 Ga. App. 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

40452.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1963.

Interpleader. Fannin Superior Court. Before Judge Burtz.

Jack G. Tarpley, for plaintiff in error.

William Butt, Herman J. Spence, contra.


This, a bill of interpleader filed by one who is possessed of funds to which he lays no claim but to which there are three people asserting their right to have the funds and alleging that it is doubtful and dangerous for him to act without direction of the court, is an equitable proceeding. Code Ann. § 37-1503. Accordingly the Supreme Court and not the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction of the writ of error and it is directed that the record be transmitted to it.

"Whenever a person shall be possessed of property or funds, or owe a debt or duty, to which more than one person shall lay claim of such a character as to render it doubtful or dangerous for the holder to act, he may apply to equity to compel the claimants to interplead. If the person bringing such action shall have to make or incur any expenses in so doing including attorney's fees, the amount so incurred shall be taxed in the bill of costs, under the approval of the court, the court in its discretion determining the amount of the attorney's fees, and shall be paid by the parties cast in the suit as other costs are now paid."

Transferred to Supreme Court. Felton, C. J., Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.


DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1963.


Summaries of

Russell v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 7, 1963
108 Ga. App. 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Russell v. Ware

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL, Administrator v. WARE, Guardian

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 7, 1963

Citations

108 Ga. App. 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
134 S.E.2d 48

Citing Cases

Adler v. Ormond

We think that the case without the injunction feature, which is not in the Georgia case, is in equity under…