From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 24, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-430-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-430-S-BN

04-24-2019

SAMUEL T. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Plaintiff Samuel T. Russell. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [Dkt. No. 8] is therefore DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 24th day of April 2019.

/s/_________

KAREN GREN SCHOLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Russell v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 24, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-430-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Russell v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL T. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 24, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-430-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2019)

Citing Cases

Christina v. Pitt

It is well established that a defendant can file a motion to dismiss challenging personal jurisdiction in…