From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Stieglitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1938
254 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

April 1, 1938.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.


In an automobile collision at the intersection of two streets in Scarsdale, the driver of one car was killed and the automobile he was driving, owned by another, was practically destroyed. The decedent was proceeding along a main arterial street and the car of the appealing defendant approached from an intersecting street at the left, where there was a full stop sign. Two actions resulted — one to recover damages for wrongful act, neglect or default of the appealing defendant, and the other for property damage. The two actions were consolidated and tried together. The plaintiffs had verdicts. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. The appeal by plaintiff Stephens is not pressed and is, therefore, dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Russell v. Stieglitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1938
254 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Russell v. Stieglitz

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE E. RUSSELL, as Administratrix, etc., of WILLIAM AVERILL RUSSELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)