From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Sep 11, 2018
557 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106085

09-11-2018

T.J. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Ellen H. Flottman, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Ellen H. Flottman, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

T.J. Russell ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant’s sole point on appeal is his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an alibi defense and call his mother to testify in support at his trial. Finding no clear error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16.


Summaries of

Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Sep 11, 2018
557 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Russell v. State

Case Details

Full title:T.J. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Sep 11, 2018

Citations

557 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Russell v. Falkenrath

After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Petitioner's amended motion (id. at 52-62). On…