From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russel v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Apr 26, 1940
305 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,509. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed April 26, 1940 Rehearing denied June 5, 1940

INSURANCE, § 498.6disability, sufficiency of evidence. In action on insurance policy for total and permanent disability, verdict for plaintiff was manifestly against the weight of the evidence, where plaintiff fell while hanging wall paper, but numerous witnesses testified that plaintiff did most of the work around her house, hung up clothes, drove a car, worked in her yard and garden, danced, and ate everything that a person in normal health would.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from County Court of Peoria county; Hon. FRANCIS C. VONACHEN, presiding.

Reversed. Heard in this court at February term, 1940.

Scott, Macleish Falk and Miller, Elliott Westervelt, for appellant;

John D. Thomason, of counsel;

Knoblock Sloan, for appellee;

John F. Sloan, Jr., of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed April 26, 1940; rehearing denied June 5, 1940.


Summaries of

Russel v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Apr 26, 1940
305 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
Case details for

Russel v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Laura M. Russell, Appellee, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Apr 26, 1940

Citations

305 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
27 N.E.2d 565

Citing Cases

Harris v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Plaintiffs rely on Greenberg v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 379 Ill. 421; Johnson v. Mutual Trust Life Ins.…

Aronson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

It is held in practically all of them that an insurance contract of this kind is construed liberally in favor…