In Russ v. Boston, 157 Mass. 60, it was declared doubtful whether a case could properly be determined on an agreed statement of facts, unless the facts agreed upon conform to what is judicially known to be the truth.
Summary of this case from Thompson v. ScottArgued April 19, 1880
Decided June 1, 1880
E. Countryman for appellant.
Esek Cowen for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Russ v. Boston, 157 Mass. 60, it was declared doubtful whether a case could properly be determined on an agreed statement of facts, unless the facts agreed upon conform to what is judicially known to be the truth.
Summary of this case from Thompson v. ScottFull title:OSCAR F. RUSS, Appellant, v . THE TROY BOSTON RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 1, 1880
In 23 Corpus Juris, 174, section 2008, it is said: "An uncontroverted allegation in a pleading or…
Davis v. R. R" 16 Cyc., 850, 852, 863, 864, and 873. "We may take notice of matters and facts that may be regarded as…