Ruiz v. State

Full title: Santiago Ruiz, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Aug 12, 2020

306 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1999

08-12-2020

Santiago RUIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General,, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General,, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for entry of an amended order of revocation that specifies, consistent with the court's oral pronouncement, those conditions of probation that the trial court found defendant violated. See, e.g., Knight v. State, 291 So. 3d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) ; Hernandez v. State, 254 So. 3d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ; T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; Wagner v. State, 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ; Brown v. State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Daniels v. State, 45 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Affirmed.