From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rueda v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 28, 2013
No. 5:13-cv-21-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 5:13-cv-21-DPM-BD

02-28-2013

JULIAN RUEDA ADC # 140164 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC RESPONDENT


ORDER

Rueda has not opposed Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No. 4. Reviewing for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee notes to 1983 Addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal with a small change. Rueda cannot proceed with his successive petition in this Court without permission from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). Rueda's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Document No. 1, is granted—not denied as moot. His petition for writ of habeas corpus, Document No. 2, is dismissed without prejudice.

So Ordered.

________________________

D.P. Marshall Jr

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rueda v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 28, 2013
No. 5:13-cv-21-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Rueda v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN RUEDA ADC # 140164 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

No. 5:13-cv-21-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 28, 2013)