From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudolph v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 17, 2018
256 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-326

08-17-2018

Tray Charles RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Tray Charles Rudolph, Dothan, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Tray Charles Rudolph, Dothan, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Tray Charles Rudolph appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief which raised twelve grounds for relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We reverse the summary denial of the first ground for relief and remand for the postconviction court to either attach sufficient records to support a summary denial or to hold an evidentiary hearing. See Hird v. State, 204 So.3d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (citing Burgos v. State, 181 So.3d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ). We affirm the summary denial of the remaining grounds. We note that review of grounds three through twelve has been waived. See Braddy v. State, 219 So.3d 803, 825 (Fla. 2017) (citing Duest v. Dugger, 555 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) ).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rudolph v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 17, 2018
256 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Rudolph v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRAY CHARLES RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 17, 2018

Citations

256 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)