From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudiger v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1908
129 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

December, 1908.


The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted to us a large volume of 361 pages which is called a brief. It is not a brief, and does not serve the purpose of elucidating and aiding which is done by a brief. It has in addition an index of 12 pages, which is about the length the brief would have been if made after the way established for the making of briefs. The case is a simple one, was tried with care and true discernment by the learned trial Judge, and as the opinion he filed leaves nothing additional to be said on the law or the facts, the judgment should be affirmed thereon. Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Hooker, JJ., concurred in result. Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Rudiger v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1908
129 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Rudiger v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE A. RUDIGER and JOHN M. RUDIGER, Appellants, v . JAMES S. COLEMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1908

Citations

129 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Citing Cases

Breuchaud v. Rudiger

There is little or no dispute as to the facts. In June, 1904, the defendants Rudiger brought an action in the…