From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudder v. Hannah

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 27, 2004
No. 02-04-112-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-112-CV

Delivered: May 27, 2004.

Appeal from the 153rd District Court of Tarrant County.

Patricia A. Rudder, pr se.

Mike McClure of Fort Worth, TX, for appellee.

Panel D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


Appellant Patricia A. Rudder appeals from the trial court's interlocutory order implicitly denying in part her motion to compel discovery. The denial of a motion to compel discovery may be challenged by a petition for mandamus, but it is not an appealable interlocutory order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In re Hinterlong, 109 S.W.3d 611, 621 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2003, orig. proceeding); see also Tex.R.App.P. 52 (governing original proceedings).

See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by Appellant, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Rudder v. Hannah

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 27, 2004
No. 02-04-112-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)
Case details for

Rudder v. Hannah

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA A. RUDDER, Appellant v. JAMES KYLE HANNAH, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 27, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-112-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Pugliese

The remainder of the orders challenged by Thomas on appeal are interlocutory and are not immediately…

Bradshaw v. Cummins S. Plains, LLC

We further stated: "The denial of a motion to compel discovery may be challenged by a petition for mandamus,…