From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruby & Assocs., P.C. v. George W. Smith & Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 24, 2012
493 Mich. 854 (Mich. 2012)

Summary

holding that to establish accounting malpractice the plaintiff must prove in accordance with MCL 600.2912a that the defendant breached the standard of care

Summary of this case from Broz v. Plante & Moran, PLLC

Opinion

Docket No. 144349. COA No. 297266.

2012-09-24

RUBY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and David I. Ruby, Plaintiffs/Counter–Defendants/ Respondents–Appellees, v. GEORGE W. SMITH & COMPANY, P.C., George W. Smith, and Joyce W. Miller, Defendants/Counter–Plaintiffs, and The Giles Law Firm, Petitioner–Appellant.


Prior report: Mich.App., 2011 WL 4580594.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Ruby & Assocs., P.C. v. George W. Smith & Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 24, 2012
493 Mich. 854 (Mich. 2012)

holding that to establish accounting malpractice the plaintiff must prove in accordance with MCL 600.2912a that the defendant breached the standard of care

Summary of this case from Broz v. Plante & Moran, PLLC
Case details for

Ruby & Assocs., P.C. v. George W. Smith & Co.

Case Details

Full title:RUBY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and David I. Ruby, Plaintiffs/Counter–Defendants…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 24, 2012

Citations

493 Mich. 854 (Mich. 2012)
493 Mich. 854

Citing Cases

Broz v. Plante & Moran, PLLC

Id. at 536, 928 N.W.2d 292. This conclusion is in accord with earlier unpublished opinions of this Court,…