From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 26, 2000
760 So. 2d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-1583.

Opinion filed May 26, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


R.P., a juvenile, appeals the order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to community control for an indeterminate period of time. We affirm the adjudication of delinquency without comment. However, the commitment order must be vacated because the term of the maximum comparable adult sanction will expire prior to R.P.'s nineteenth birthday. See T.J. v. State, 743 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); A.C. v. State, 688 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). But see C.F. v. State, 603 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). This matter is remanded for the imposition of a new commitment order consistent herewith.

Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded with instructions in part.

GREEN, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.


Summaries of

R.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 26, 2000
760 So. 2d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

R.P. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.P., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 26, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

T.W.B. v. State

However, the commitment order must be vacated because the maximum concurrent one-year sanction will expire…

J.A.L. v. State

The indefinite term of community control was erroneous because the order could have been construed to extend…