Summary
finding law firm was not discharged for cause
Summary of this case from Antonmarchi v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkOpinion
No. 97-7301.
January 8, 1999.
Appeal from the N.D.N.Y., 952 F.Supp. 125.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Royal Indem. v. Providence Washington
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1999
172 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1999)
Summaries of
Royal Indem. v. Providence Washington
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1999
172 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1999)
finding law firm was not discharged for cause
Summary of this case from Antonmarchi v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New Yorknoting that the preamble to the Local Rules provides that "[t]hese rules are adopted for the internal management of the case load of the court and shall not be deemed to vest any rights in litigants or their attorneys. . . ."
Summary of this case from U.S. v. AgateCase details for
Royal Indem. v. Providence Washington
Case Details
Full title:Royal Indem. Co. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Jan 8, 1999
Citations
172 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1999)
Citing Cases
Collier v. United States
Collier unsuccessfully appealed his conviction and his sentence. United States v. Collier , 172 F.3d 38 (2d…
Wood v. Mut. Redevelopment HousesRDB at 1. No litigant “would have any right to reassignment even if there had been a departure from the RDB.”…