From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowland v. Swaying Oaks Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Aug 9, 2023
No. 04-23-00315-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

04-23-00315-CV

08-09-2023

Michelle ROWLAND, Appellant v. SWAYING OAKS APARTMENTS, Appellee


From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV02142 Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant attempts to appeal the trial court's judgment awarding possession of real property to Swaying Oaks Apartments. The trial court signed the judgment on March 2, 2023.

The only issue in a forcible detainer action is the right to actual possession of the property. Tex.R.Civ.P. 510.3(e); Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex. 2006). A judgment of possession in such an action determines only the right to immediate possession and is not a final determination of whether an eviction is wrongful. Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787. When a forcible detainer defendant fails to file a supersedeas bond in the amount set by the county court, the judgment may be enforced and a writ of possession may be executed, evicting the defendant from the property. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007; Tex.R.Civ.P. 510.13; Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786. If a forcible detainer defendant fails to supersede the judgment and loses possession of the property, the appeal is moot unless the defendant: (1) timely and clearly expressed his or her intent to appeal; and (2) asserted "a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the [property]." Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787.

A review of the clerk's record indicates appellant did not file a supersedeas bond. The clerk's record also shows a writ of possession was issued by the county clerk and the writ was executed on May 4, 2023. Therefore, on June 13, 2023, we ordered appellant to file a written response on or before June 28, 2023, explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not responded to our order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), (c).


Summaries of

Rowland v. Swaying Oaks Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Aug 9, 2023
No. 04-23-00315-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Rowland v. Swaying Oaks Apartments

Case Details

Full title:Michelle ROWLAND, Appellant v. SWAYING OAKS APARTMENTS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

No. 04-23-00315-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2023)