From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowland v. Sw. Corr.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 4:20-CV-847 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-CV-847

09-15-2021

DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND, v. SOUTHWESTERN CORRECTIONAL, LLC, ET AL.


Nowak, Judge

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 17, 2021, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #67) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Southwest Correctional, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Corrections, LLC, d/b/a/ LaSalle Southwest Corrections; LaSalle Management Company, LLC; Warden Stacey King; Sheriff Mark Johnson; and Fannin County, Texas's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #40) be granted in part and denied in part.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED Defendants Southwestern Correctional, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Corrections, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Southwest Corrections; LaSalle Management Company, LLC; Warden Stacey King; Sheriff Mark Johnson; and Fannin County, Texas's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #40) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims for violation of his Eighth Amendment rights and any claim for violation of his constitutional rights stemming from a failure to train are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against Southwestern Correctional, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Corrections, LLC, d/b/a LaSalle Southwest Corrections; LaSalle Management Company, LLC; Warden Stacey King; and the unserved John and Jane Does are DISMISSED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be permitted an opportunity to file an amended complaint as to his municipal liability claims against Fannin County under the Fourteenth Amendment and his claims for negligence or gross negligence. The Magistrate Judge shall issue an order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Rowland v. Sw. Corr.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 4:20-CV-847 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Rowland v. Sw. Corr.

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND, v. SOUTHWESTERN CORRECTIONAL, LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-CV-847 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)

Citing Cases

Webb v. McQuade

nd that privately-operated detention centers operate under color of state law when such facilities have a…

Walters v. Lasalle Corr.

Rowland v. Sw. Corr., LLC, No. 4:20-CV-00847-ALM-CAN, 2021 WL 4206409, at *8-11 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2021)…