From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

91909

Decided and Entered: December 5, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Sydney Rowe, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CREW III, J.P., PETERS, CARPINELLO, MUGGLIN and, LAHTINEN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violent conduct, assault on a staff member, refusing to obey a direct order, making threats and violating movement regulations. As set forth in the misbehavior report, petitioner refused to cooperate with the efforts of correction officers who had been directed to move him into a double cell. In order to accomplish the move, the officers were compelled to subdue petitioner with physical restraints and carry him. While being transported, petitioner bit one of the officers on the hand and, after he was locked into the new cell, he repeatedly shouted threats at the officers.

Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt of the charged misconduct was presented in the form of, inter alia, the detailed misbehavior report, the unusual incident report and the testimony of two correction officers who witnessed the incident in question (see Matter of Thomas v. Goord, 293 A.D.2d 799, 800, lv dismissed, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 727; Matter of Serrano v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 661, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 762). The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

CREW III, J.P., PETERS, CARPINELLO, MUGGLIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Rowe v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Rowe v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SYDNEY ROWE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 535

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Porter

Petitioner thereafter commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the…

In the Matter of Boyd v. Goord

As to the balance of the determination, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that it is not…