From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rovi Solutions Corp. v. Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
CASE NO. 12-cv-01398-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-cv-01398-RS CASE NO. 12-cv-04209-RS

03-20-2013

ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD., SHANGHAI LENOVO ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., LENOVO (HUIYANG) ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., and LENOVO INFORMATION PRODUCTS (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD., Defendants. ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., Defendant.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) Joseph M. Paunovich (Bar No. 228222) Attorneys for Plaintiff ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION Megan Whyman Olesek (CSB No. 191218) KENYON & KENYON LLP John Flock (admitted pro hac vice ) KENYON & KENYON LLP Douglas E. Ringel (admitted pro hac vice ) KENYON & KENYON LLP Attorneys for Defendants LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD., SHANGHAI LENOVO ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., and LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)

Joseph M. Paunovich (Bar No. 228222) Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Megan Whyman Olesek (CSB No. 191218)
KENYON & KENYON LLP
John Flock (admitted pro hac vice)
KENYON & KENYON LLP
Douglas E. Ringel (admitted pro hac vice)
KENYON & KENYON LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.,
LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD., SHANGHAI
LENOVO ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., and
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND

TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF

PRELIMINARY CLAIM

CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC

EVIDENCE UNDER PATENT L.R. 4-2

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time for Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Under Patent L.R. 4-2. The current deadline for such exchange under Patent L.R. 4-2 is March 21, 2013. Good cause appearing, the time for both parties to exchange such information is extended until March 29, 2013.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

By: __________

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

Rovi Solutions Corp. v. Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
CASE NO. 12-cv-01398-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Rovi Solutions Corp. v. Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12-cv-01398-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)