Rousseau v. Tobin

Full title: ANN ROUSSEAU, Appellant, v. CYRIL R. TOBIN et al., Respondents

Court: Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 26, 1957

148 Cal.App.2d 972 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957)

307 P.2d 378

Opinion

Docket No. 16987.

February 26, 1957.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank T. Deasy, Judge. Affirmed.

Ann Rousseau, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Tobin Tobin and John J. Hopkins for Respondents.

DOOLING, Acting P.J.

This case is similar to Rousseau v. O'Gara, No. 17019, ante, p. 676 [ 307 P.2d 376], this day decided. Respondents are attorneys who represented parties adverse to appellant in the prior action, Rousseau v. Hurtado, 122 Cal.App.2d 705 [ 265 P.2d 580]. The amended complaint contains allegations similar to those found in the O'Gara case. Respondents' demurrer to appellant's amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Kaufman, J., and Draper, J. pro tem.,^_ concurred.

_ Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 25, 1957.