From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. Tex. Capital Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Jan 31, 2013
391 S.W.3d 679 (Tex. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 05–13–00050–CV.

2013-01-31

Steve ROUSE, Appellant v. TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Appellee.

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DC–12–13003; Lorainne Raggio, Judge. Michael Wynne, Sherman, for appellant. Donald E. Godwin, Robert C. Wiegand, Dallas, for appellee.


On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DC–12–13003; Lorainne Raggio, Judge.
Michael Wynne, Sherman, for appellant. Donald E. Godwin, Robert C. Wiegand, Dallas, for appellee.
Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices LANG–MIERS and LEWIS.

OPINION


Opinion by Chief Justice WRIGHT.

Before the Court is the January 18, 2013 joint motion to set aside appealed part of judgment pursuant to settlement. In the motion, the parties state they have settled all claims between them. The parties also state, and our records show, that Tri–County Autoplex was a party in the trial court, but did not perfect an appeal. We grant the parties' joint motion, and pursuant to the parties request, set aside without regard to the merits the portion of the judgment that awards damages and injunctive relief against Rouse, and remand that portion of the judgment to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement.

SeeTex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).


Summaries of

Rouse v. Tex. Capital Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Jan 31, 2013
391 S.W.3d 679 (Tex. App. 2013)
Case details for

Rouse v. Tex. Capital Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Steve ROUSE, Appellant v. TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

391 S.W.3d 679 (Tex. App. 2013)