From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. McCall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 15, 2013
C/A No.: 6:11-cv-734 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

C/A No.: 6:11-cv-734 DCN

02-15-2013

GLENN A. ROUSE, #263004, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MCCALL, WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the court pursuant to petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order affirming the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and granting the Motion for Summary Judgment. This motion was filed on February 8, 2013.

Petitioner argues in his motion that the order stated his objections were not timely filed on July 26, 2012. Although the objections were not received in the Clerk's Office until July 30, 2012, they are considered timely filed because they were received by the mailroom at Perry Correctional Institution on July 26, 2012, the date objections to the Report and Recommendation were due. Indeed, the order stated that objections were timely filed on July 30, 2012. Petitioner's objections were considered by the undersigned. It is therefore

ORDERED, that the plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

David C. Norton

United States District Judge
February 15, 2013
Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

Rouse v. McCall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 15, 2013
C/A No.: 6:11-cv-734 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Rouse v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:GLENN A. ROUSE, #263004, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MCCALL, WARDEN, PERRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

C/A No.: 6:11-cv-734 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2013)